Ad

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Stony Brook Petition Voices No Confidence in President's Academic Leadership

By George Agathos and Michael Kelly

An online petition criticizing the leadership of Stony Brook President Shirley Strum Kenny has received 100 electronic signatures of tenured and tenure-track faculty at the university.

While the petition features the names of faculty from many areas on campus, the majority are from departments within the College of Arts and Sciences. Those departments faced a large cut in teaching funds and classes that was restored before enrollment started over two weeks ago.

Christopher Sellers, an associate professor of history whose signature is the twenty third on the petition, wrote in an email that he hoped it would cause President Shirley Strum Kenny to take into account the faculty’s opinion about what is in the best interest of the university and the education it offers to its undergraduate community. However, Sellers is not sure that the petition he signed will cause Kenny’s leadership philosophy to change.

“Given what I've seen, I'm afraid she's just not interested in what we think, or for all her lip service, in the actual quality of education that SB undergraduates get,” Sellers wrote.

Sellers also decried the amount of money on expanding the size of Stony Brook, both in terms of campus size and the amount of programs offered.

“Seeing all those millions meanwhile being expended to build entire new programs and purchase and build up entire new campuses--at some point the message sinks in,” he wrote. “There is some money around; it's just being funneled away from our depts.”

Sellers pointed to the expansion of the student body, while at the same time diminishing the amount of tenured and tenure-track faculty by 10%, as a key cog to the problem the College of Arts and Sciences faces. Sellers, who has been at Stony Brook since 1998, wrote that he has noticed a change in the size of his classes as the university has expanded.

“We've watched as our classes have become ever more packed, to the point where upper level courses routinely have a hundred students in them, with more than that trying to get in,” he wrote.

Sellers said that this problem will not be able to be rectified immediately.

“It will take years to bring the ratio of tenured and tenure track faculty up to where it was before Shirley Kenny arrived,” he wrote.

The petition, at least a week old, reads as follows:

Quote:

Statistics in bullet point 2 are since 1994

To: President Shirley Strum Kenny

A Resolution of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Stony Brook University expressing loss of confidence in the academic leadership of President Kenny.

We the undersigned would like to express our dismay and outrage over the chronic and damaging under-funding of the academic sector of the College of Arts and Sciences of the Stony Brook University. The recent forced closure of a quarter of the College’s fall 2008 courses, though rescinded, marks an ominous turn in what has been a long-term pattern of negligence. Over the past ten years (1997-2007), the size of the undergraduate student body has grown by 26\%, and the College of Arts and Sciences has been pressed into service for expanding or newly-created undergraduate programs including Journalism, Business, and Marine Sciences. Two satellite campuses have been purchased and developed, and other major initiatives undertaken, all at enormous expense. Meanwhile, the College’s core missions of teaching and scholarship have been seriously eroded. There has been:

• a failure to add any undergraduate classroom space to the main campus
• an overall reduction of more than 10\% in the number of full-time tenured or tenure-track faculty, a sharp increase in the student-faculty ratio from 23:1 to an estimated 34:1, a nearly 50\% increase
• a rise in the percentage of courses taught by adjunct professors or teaching assistants
• a loss of faculty morale and a disturbing flight of top faculty to well-run universities
• repeated cut-backs of the Melville Library budget, leading to shrinking personnel and printed book holdings

Among the consequences of these conditions:

• students find it harder to register for the courses they need, and difficult to graduate in a timely fashion
• students find themselves in upper-level classes far larger than is appropriate for advanced levels of instruction
• professors are unable to accord students the kind of attention and directed feedback that characterizes best teaching practices
• professors and students meet in inadequate and inappropriate classrooms (including an un-refurbished cafeteria), which do not allow for the kind of group work and participatory learning that have been shown to constitute best teaching practices
• students closed out of required courses during regular academic-year terms are forced to take Winter or Summer Session classes, mostly taught by non-tenure-track faculty, which proceed at a pace many educators agree is not conducive to learning
• students and faculty alike are losing access to books and journals fundamental to teaching, learning, and research

For all these reasons, we demand an accounting of the priorities and decisions that have starved the College of Arts and Sciences of essential resources. We also wish to register our loss of confidence in the academic leadership of President Shirley Strum Kenny, whom we hold responsible for this egregious mismanagement.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

Read the Independent for more information as the story develops.

Links
Petition
Signatures

go george and mike!

So apparently anyone can sign the petition, including students, and anyone with access to the internet. "Shirley Strum Kenny" seems to have signed it.

Check again Dave. A parallel on-line petition for undergrads will be available for signing shortly; stayed tuned.

An undergrad petition effort is now underway, in parallel with that of the faculty and grad students. You can reach the undergrad petition at:
http://www.petitiononline.com/CUSBU/petition.html

SPEAK OUT FOR STONY BROOK!

So I checked again and there are still invalid signatures on the petition.
Changing settings on petitiononline.com to say that they will be reviewed and approved doesn't make the legitimate. And a student petition will only be that much harder to review. It may have started out with real professors, but at this point there is nothing that will show that the signatures are real. You're expecting people to believe that the person who started the petition will now also be responsible for independently verifying the signatures, and of potentially thousands of undergrads. Good luck.

Do check again Dave. All names of faculty petition signers have now been verified independently by phone and email contact.

As for knowing that some of the "real" faculty names up still up there on Monday were the acts of malicious spamming--well, Dave, just how might you have known that?

And if you are our spammer, what exactly do you have against such petitions? After all, as Kenny herself has noted, it's a right that written into the Constitution...

"You're expecting people to believe that the person who started the petition will now also be responsible for independently verifying the signatures"

I don't have anything against petitions, just bogus claims and sensationalist journalism. I happen to know there are invalid signatures because mine is one of them and I have not received an email nor a phone call. Perhaps I'm wrong and you're just too lazy to call. But either way you are detracting from your own apparent cause by manipulating this petition or by failing to actually enforce verification. Stop the lies.

So let me get this straight Dave; you are the one sitting around sending in all those 15-20 spammed names onto our web-page over the last week? If there really is one we've missed, the only way to prove it to us is to tell us exactly which one. We will then be happy to correct the lie you have forced on us.

You might try getting a life, too.

Actually no, the only name I've submitted is my own. And I'm glad you are willing to admit the implicit dysfunction of the online petition though. As for getting a life, I suppose if you're willing to generate a faulty online petition to grab attention for a cause that you haven't otherwise been able to, then it's simply a matter of conscience to point out your inability to legitimize your propaganda.

hose departments faced a large cut in teaching funds and classes that was restored before enrollment started over two weeks ago. online masters degree | Life Experience Degree | almeda | Corllinsuniversity | online doctorate degree